首页> 外文OA文献 >An Experimental Comparison of Force-Directed and Randomized Graph Drawing Algorithms
【2h】

An Experimental Comparison of Force-Directed and Randomized Graph Drawing Algorithms

机译:力导向和随机图形绘制算法的实验比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report on our experiments with five graph drawing algorithms for general undirected graphs. These are the algorithms FR introduced by Fruchterman and Reingold [5], KK by Kamada and Kawai [11], Tu by Tunkelang [13] and GEM by Frick, Ludwig and Mehldau [6]. Implementations of these algorithms have been intergrated into our GraphEd systems [9]. We have tested these algorithms on a wide collection of examples and with different settings of parameters. Our examples are from original papers and by our own. The obtained drawings are evaluated both empirically and by GraphEd's evaluation toolkit. As a conclusion we can confirm the reported good behaviour of the algorithms. Combining time and quality we recommend to use GEM or KK first, then FR and Tu and finally DH.
机译:我们报告了针对一般无向图的五种图形绘制算法进行的实验。这些是Fruchterman和Reingold [5]提出的算法FR,Kamada和Kawai [11]提出的KK,Tunkelang [13]提出的Tu和Frick,Ludwig和Mehldau [6]提出的GEM。这些算法的实现已集成到我们的GraphEd系统中[9]。我们已经在大量示例和不同参数设置下测试了这些算法。我们的示例来自原始论文,也来自我们自己。通过经验和GraphEd的评估工具包对获得的图形进行评估。作为结论,我们可以确认所报告算法的良好行为。结合时间和质量,我们建议首先使用GEM或KK,然后使用FR和Tu,最后使用DH。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号